Alaska Air toilet squabble, censored in-flight movies, don’t panic with in-flight engine loss

You can nearly smell the paint from here. 2 months old.
image_print

Alaska Airlines restroom-use squabble leads to wrongful detainment, $11,500 lawsuit claims

Jessica DeWitt and Michael Dobbs are suing Alaska Airlines for wrongful detainment over first-class restroom use.

The pair were seated in the first-class cabin, and DeWitt needed to use the restroom. Yet passengers from coach kept walking up to use the first-class restroom — and DeWitt grew more uncomfortable by the minute as she waited for an opportunity to use the toilet.

Patton said when DeWitt asked a flight attendant if she would make an announcement stating that passengers were only to use the restrooms in their assigned cabins, the flight attendant said she would not.

Inside the billion-dollar, super-censored inflight movie industry

Any time you watch a movie on an airplane (unless you are using one of those personal video units), you’ll notice that it has been censored and edited for airplane use. How do the censors decide what to include in a movie?

“Depending on which region the airline is from, there will be different tolerances,” says Jovita Toh, CEO at Encore Inflight Limited, an inflight distributor for airlines based in Hong Kong.

“Europeans are OK with some nudity but cannot tolerate gore and too much violence.

Here’s why you shouldn’t panic when an airliner loses an engine in flight

Most people panic when an airplane loses an engine in flight. Benjamin Zhang of Business Insider takes a look at why you shouldn’t panic.

When an aircraft is flying without one of its engines, it tends to fly at a lower altitude and work the remaining engine(s) harder. This makes the plane less fuel efficient and reduces range. However, the vast majority of twin-engine long-haul airliners can perform this maneuver with no significant reduction in capabilities.

(Photo: BriYYZ/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Johnp

    Love it: The writer feels comfortable saying that “the vast majority of twin-engine long-haul airlines” do fine even if one engine fails. So, might “YOU” be the one flying on a plane that is just outside the so-called vast majority. I call it stretching a human’s comfortable level.

  • http://tsanewsblog.com/214/news/history-repeats-itself-with-tsas-strip-search-tactics/ Lisa Simeone

    Jessica DeWitt and Michael Dobbs have too much money and not enough sense.

  • Josh Josh

    Or, you could just DRIVE there, which is the least safe method of travel in the united states. by hundreds of times!

  • Josh Josh

    Yes, the judge will tell them they should have gone to the potty before they left home.

  • Johnp

    Josh — or double Josh: Driving is indeed less safe than flying — but we should both realize I was not referring to driving vs flying. That one was easy for you — and me. But the fact remains you indicated that the “vast majority” of twin-engine long-haul airlines” do fine if one engine fails. And I wonder who would feel comfortable knowing it is ONLY the VAST MAJORITY twin-engine long-haul airlines and not ALL. I am of the thought we will both continue flying but be aware of the twin-engine long-haul airlines limitations and history. Case closed. Enjoy your next flight as I expect I will also.